firefox 34 de-improves search

firefox_design_team

firefox design team, 2004-2014

We've been tracking Firefox changes-for-the-sake-of-change that occur with its new accelerated update schedule. The latest is de-improved search. Before, you could select which engine you wanted to use before you began typing in the search bar. Now you don't get the engine dropdown until you type something, and once you've typed a few letters, if it's a search you've done before, the browser provides you a list of search terms with those letters. If you choose any of those terms, you must go wherever your default search engine takes you.

Thus, if your default search engine is Google, let's say you type the letters "re," and the word "renoise" comes up on the list of previous searches. If you choose "renoise" from that list you are automatically taken to Google. If you want Wikipedia, tough luck, you have to go to Google first. But if you type out the entire word "renoise" you are then given a selection of other providers' icons to choose from.

It worked fine before -- why do this? (Apologies to the innate smarts of chimpanzees.)

Update: Sorry, had to pull this post briefly and rewrite while I figured out the sophisticated awfulness of the new search and how to describe it.

around the web

Three "long-form" posts that give you something to mull over:

Netherlands-based cyber-thinker Geert Lovink considers the state of theory after the Sn0wd3n m0m3nt. (Caution: arty not-safe-for-work photo from e-flux also graces the page.) This essay from April 2014 makes a nice (though more opaque) bookend to the talk by cybersecurity expert Dan Geer about opting-out. Lovink isn't saying we should opt out, precisely, but acknowledges a "God is dead" situation for new media types: after the years of accelerated transparency and sharing that were going to change everything we suddenly realized we had compiled a dossier on ourselves. So, now what?

Matt Stoller's piece on the censored 28 pages in the government's 9/11 report that possibly tell us about the involvement of U.S. "allies" in the attacks. If this information had been known years of pointless violence might have been avoided, etc. Stoller posted this on Medium, another startup content-suck.

Richard Prince reminisces about his days hanging out with Jeff Koons in late-'70s NYC. The item is dated 9/17/2014 and can currently be found at the top on this large wad of non-permalinked writing on Prince's personal website. Prince makes a good case for Koons' art, woven into a rambling autobiography. (hat tip sdb)

Around the web

Social media compound eye photography: 30+ views of the same modernist sculpture, Richard Lippold's Ad Astra (via dataisnature)

Secret Ninja, by Duncan Alexander: (i) wall with independently scrolling brick layers seen through eyehole or possibly (ii) gas giant planet made of masonry

lugia meets sinusoidal turbulence

some new twitter.com/vvorks, e.g., "tennis ball hovers before Christian tableau painting while man squats on the museum floor"

Too Much Concept, which one hopes will be the antidote to all self-conscious conceptual-art-on-the-Net projects that keep us stuck in the eternally recursive moment of Douglas Huebler, John Baldessari, Sol LeWitt, et al. Not sure that more imitations of 1968-1972 are the way out of this loop but there are good ideas on this page. It will be hard for most people to wrap their minds around artists poking fun at artists who think they are poking fun at other artists, not to stand in the way of complexity.

And last, a note to California-based internet artists: No more pictures of the Hollywood sign, please?