Home Electro for Fun and Profit -- LP liner notes

Notes for the Home Electro for Fun and Profit LP on Bandcamp. These are mostly tech jottings so I remember what I did. Any thoughts, questions, etc on the music itself are welcome at the email address on this about page -- the contact form on Bandcamp also works. This is my tenth and final Bandcamp release for 2014 -- 100 songs in all have been published this year. Am working on CD-R and cassette versions of all of these; a cassette version of this release is available on Bandcamp (including streaming and downloads) as well as the digital version. "Home Electro..." is mostly new material, with a few accelerated versions of older tunes -- meaning they are played faster, cut and spliced with new ideas.

1. Jeff's Birthday 02:57

In several songs on this release I am using the Expert Sleepers "Step LFO" plugin, which converts audio signals from a PC into sequenced control voltages that can be used to drive Eurorack modules. One channel sends gate info and another sends pitch -- these do not have to be synchronous. In this tune am crafting synth patches with the Step LFO output in combination with hardware (LFOs, VCAs, filters, compressor, and pitch-shifting effect to make the quasi-chords). In most of these, the underlying sound source is ALM's SID GUTS module, which includes a vintage Commodore 64 sound chip. SID GUTS also has its own internal modulation, which can be triggered by this same computer/hardware setup. Loops from live sessions are recorded, cut up, and rearranged in Cubase; am also adding beats (a stripped-down version of a Loopmash preset).

2. Antimatter Park (132 bpm) 01:51

Beats and minced vocal sounds made in the Elektron Octatrack and rearranged in Cubase. In this tune and "Antimatter Park," am using the Octatrack's LFOs to randomize sample rates, sample start times, comb filter settings, and other variables. You may note the repurposing of samples from "Random Series Ending," a tune on my previous LP. Sorry, I had a few more things I wanted to do with those!

3. Electroll 1 (2014) 02:18

I made CD versions of my earlier tunes and inadvertently played them 16% faster in a DJ-style CD deck, and many of them sound better to my ears now. This "atmospheric hiphop piece" (as I described it last year) is rearranged, then sped up, using timestretch to preserve the pitch. The original was done mostly with the Reaktor Rhythmaker synth and reverb'd Vermona Kick Lancet desktop drum unit (the latter is making the eerie hoot owl sound, among others). A melody from the end of the song was moved to the beginning and many notes were trimmed to increase the pace.

4. Heavy Hippos (Double Spectral) 01:56

A piece from 2005, "Heavy Heavy Hippos," employed Native Instrument's now-discontinued Spektral Delay plug-in. Trying to duplicate that sound I used the "Spectral" effect from the Reaktor User Library, which is not as versatile. The first part of this tune features Spectral and the second part is a drastically reworked (and sped-up) "Heavy Heavy Hippos," with a new synth line and ride cymbal drum solo.

5. Cut Bait 01:20

That same DJ deck I used to boost the speed of my earlier tunes allows one to make loops "on the fly," as they say, using the unit's push buttons, so I recorded a bunch of these, beat-matched them in Cubase and made this arrangement.

6. A-112 Delay Experiments 02:51

Doepfer A-112 sampler in delay mode, with a couple of mixers to create a feedback loop. Six minutes of meandering experimentation (posted in 2012) were cut back to 2:51 and the underlying beats were tightened up for this leaner, meaner version.

7. Blight Curvature 2:29

Bass, piano and some atmospherics done with the Linplug Alpha softsynth. The percussion is all turntable sounds manicured and run through various effects. The e-piano part was moved from the end to the beginning and the speed was increased (again, with timestretch to preserve the pitch).

8. Spheres 303 01:03

Expert Sleepers ES-3 and Step LFO plugin used with various Eurorack oscillators and filters for a short TB-303 like jam. It's not as spontaneous as it sounds -- loops got moved around and miraculously remained fluid and crackle-free, which is unusual with this much "live" filtering.

9. Antimatter Park 02:30

Same method as Antimatter Park (132 bpm) -- the bpm here is 105.

10. NY Home Electro Suite 03:44

Same method as "Jeff's Birthday" above but adding some other oscillators: Tiptop's Z3000 and WMD's Gamma Wave Source.

just scroll, dude

samsung-ansel

samsung-andy

samsung-vincent

Let's roll the videotape back to that conversation where ZK was wondering what the fuss was about a 16:9 screen (that is, why someone might hate it and prefer a square, or square-ish, screen). If one's response to the above is "just scroll" then we have indeed reached an unbridgeable aesthetic gulf.

ZK: Ok, I get it, but, as we've been taught, the cinema screen is the screen above all.

ZK: 16:9

ZK: or whatever.

DE: Most users don't watch video all day though.

ZK: Ah, yes, as I see on the site:

ZK: "The extended vertical space is convenient for displaying large amounts of information in long windows, reducing the need for excess scrolling and providing a more efficient view of data."

ZK: IS THIS FOR HOME USE?

DE: I want one for sure.

ZK: But Dragan

ZK: You're an artist.

DE: The cinema format is so lame because it is optimized for not moving your eyes.

ZK: Can u expand?

DE: Cinema is supposed just to fill out your whole view and to take in the "complete picture."

ZK: Whereas a square, you're like, "why is this a square?", and then u pay attention?

DE: On the square, I can let my eyes wander.

ZK: ah. hrm.

[Bad answers, DE. Cinematic ratios were originally designed for movie theates, where the panorama was supposed to engulf you and thereby heighten realism. There is no need for this illusion when checking the weather or your bank balance, yet on conventional PCs that's now the default screen size. --TM]

ZK: Still think this sounds like an office piece....

ZK: Are there any artworks or other media things you think would look particularly good in this format?

DE: I believe it is more interactive, gives a viewer more power.

DE: VINE BIENNAL

ZK: Ha. Yes. Any mobile phone type thing, right? Which is based on the scroll paradigm?

DE: Casio WQV10 photo exhibition.

casio650

Dragan Espenschied, The Thousand Faces Of Pikachu

DE: No, vine and insta just chose square because it is the same no matter how you rotate the device

ZK: Well, I don't think either rotate, tbh.

ZK: Classic Blackberry owner comment.

ZK: Tho I'm starting to see the FEED use for this... but then I'm still like, "just scroll!"

DE: Well, touch screens *and* device rotation weren't worth all the trouble.

ZK: (Btw, I like the kind of opiate of the masses take on cinema you're plying here. Very Kracauer.)

ZK: (Very anti-authoritarian.)

ZK: Is the square computer anarchist?

DE: It is not consumerist for a start.

ZK: THAT IS FOR SURE

[Again, cinematic ratios were originally designed for movie theates, where the panorama was supposed to engulf you and thereby heighten realism. There is no need for this illusion when checking the weather or your bank balance, yet on conventional PCs that's now the default screen size. --TM]

DE: The best exhibition for this format would be Olia's collection of transparent web pixels.

DE: http://art.teleportacia.org/observation/clear.gif/

ZK: Nice.

ZK: Oh wait, one last q

ZK: is this happening only now?

ZK: Is it hard to make a square monitor?

ZK: Or is the market so fractured, individualized, it only made sense to make one now?

DE: If you read the comments on tech blogs announcing this monitor, lots of users speak up that they had enough of 16:9 or 21:9 because what they need to see expands below that format.

DE: The market for screens is actually shockingly homogeneous, with everything being 16:9 or wider.

DE: I don't think other formats are more difficult to make

ZK:

comment650

ZK: Well — I'm happy for people who need this. The market should meet every need!

the present moment

dumpfm-aoifeml-B3eqR4MIMAAtTis

hat tip aoifeml -- the title "B3eqR4MIMAAtTis" suggests a Tumblr nexus and before that, who knows, photo-credit-wise

The kids are (i) turning their backs on patriarchy and privilege (ii) reading the online study guide for the painting (iii) giving Steve Jobs a posthumous rush.
Answer (iii).

Update: the Tumblr-esque alphanumeric salad / image anonymizer in fact originates on Twitter and the photo is by Gijsbert van der Wal (hat tips Ryz)

square-ish monitor

imgSamsung LT-P17454.jpg

Annoying autobiographical detail, apropos of the square monitor discussion: this was my main computer screen from approx 2004-2010: Samsung LCD screen that can be used as a TV, or with a PC. As late as 2004 they were still imitating the old 4:3 CRT orientation. We were not yet conditioned to expect our lives to be a work of total widescreen 24/7 cinematic adventure with Dolby™ and Sensurround™.
Another addendum to that Rhizome "square monitor" discussion (briefly addresseed in Zoë Salditch's comment): surely the more seismic shift isn't from 4:3 to 16:9 but from landscape to portrait in everybody's smartphones. Have given serious thought to dropping my sidebar for that reason. (Drifting with the prevailing winds of orientation fashion.)

square monitor discussion (rescued ephemero-blogging)

Rhizome.org continues its practice of "ephemeral blogging" -- apparently after becoming alarmed by reader flight to flighty social media services such as Facebook and Twitter, they decided their best course was to imitate those, rather than continue to offer an alternative (a permanent record, "substance," a way for artists to keep score).
More substantive articles continue to appear alongside "Rhizome Today," but it's the blink-and-you-miss-it content that's often the most interesting, before it disappears down the ephemera-hole.
Our sharp-eyed editors saved one such discussion and it is reproduced below. Anyone trained as an artist will weep with frustration reading Zachary Kaplan's somewhat dismissive failure to see why someone might not want a 16:9 cinematic ratio for everyday computing and art-making. Imagine an art class where a teacher hands out long sheets of landscape-oriented paper and says, "draw a picture of the tallest person you know, and you are not allowed to rotate this sheet of paper."
What follows is all from "Rhizome Today":

squarecomputer

A very odd promotional image for the FlexScan EV2730Q

This is Rhizome Today for Friday, November 21, 2014.

Rhizome Today is an experiment in ephemeral blogging: a series of posts that are written hastily in response to current events, and taken offline within a day or so. The latest post can always be found at http://www.rhizome.org/today.

[Editor's Note: We offer Rhizome Today contributors a variety of formats to use in writing their ephemeral post. An IM chat is one.]

Dragan Espenscheid: EIZO announces square monitor: http://www.eizoglobal.com/press/releases/htmls/ev2730q.html

Zachary Kaplan: I don't get it.

DE: 1:1 ratio like a Blackberry screen

ZK: Ok, I get it, but, as we've been taught, the cinema screen is the screen above all.

ZK: 16:9

ZK: or whatever.

DE: Most users don't watch video all day though.

ZK: Ah, yes, as I see on the site:

ZK: "The extended vertical space is convenient for displaying large amounts of information in long windows, reducing the need for excess scrolling and providing a more efficient view of data."

ZK: IS THIS FOR HOME USE?

DE: I want one for sure.

ZK: But Dragan

ZK: You're an artist.

DE: The cinema format is so lame because it is optimized for not moving your eyes.

ZK: Can u expand?

DE: Cinema is supposed just to fill out your whole view and to take in the "complete picture."

ZK: Whereas a square, you're like, "why is this a square?", and then u pay attention?

DE: On the square, I can let my eyes wander.

ZK: ah. hrm.

ZK: Still think this sounds like an office piece....

ZK: Are there any artworks or other media things you think would look particularly good in this format?

DE: I believe it is more interactive, gives a viewer more power.

DE: VINE BIENNAL

ZK: Ha. Yes. Any mobile phone type thing, right? Which is based on the scroll paradigm?

DE: Casio WQV10 photo exhibition.

casio650

Dragan Espenschied, The Thousand Faces Of Pikachu

DE: No, vine and insta just chose square because it is the same no matter how you rotate the device

ZK: Well, I don't think either rotate, tbh.

ZK: Classic Blackberry owner comment.

ZK: Tho I'm starting to see the FEED use for this... but then I'm still like, "just scroll!"

DE: Well, touch screens *and* device rotation weren't worth all the trouble.

ZK: (Btw, I like the kind of opiate of the masses take on cinema you're plying here. Very Kracauer.)

ZK: (Very anti-authoritarian.)

ZK: Is the square computer anarchist?

DE: It is not consumerist for a start.

ZK: THAT IS FOR SURE

DE: The best exhibition for this format would be Olia's collection of transparent web pixels.

DE: http://art.teleportacia.org/observation/clear.gif/

ZK: Nice.

ZK: Oh wait, one last q

ZK: is this happening only now?

ZK: Is it hard to make a square monitor?

ZK: Or is the market so fractured, individualized, it only made sense to make one now?

DE: If you read the comments on tech blogs announcing this monitor, lots of users speak up that they had enough of 16:9 or 21:9 because what they need to see expands below that format.

DE: The market for screens is actually shockingly homogeneous, with everything being 16:9 or wider.

DE: I don't think other formats are more difficult to make

ZK:

comment650

ZK: Well — I'm happy for people who need this. The market should meet every need!

hearts

[Rhizome] Editor's Note: During the editing process, this last minute comment was added:

Scott Meisburger: LCD panels are manufactured in giant sheets and then sliced up. I've read that the recent move to 16:9 everything (which is further from the golden ratio than the original Apple Cinema 16:10) has to do with normalizing the assembly. because all the panels are really made by 1 or 2 companies in Asia.

SM: ^^ pro tip

Comments (2)

Golan Levin | Fri, Nov 21st, 2014 1:08 p.m.
It's understandable that there wouldn't be a lot of "home-cinema" demand for square LCDs. But many new-media artists -- particularly those who work in the field of generative software art and abstract computational imagery -- have sought a square LCD format for years. The usage case for such a monitor is the gallery or art-collection. Think about the work of artists like Manfred Mohr, John Maeda, Marius Watz, or (the Austrian software artist) Lia.

One reason the square format is appealing is that it doesn't "privilege" the horizontal over the vertical; it is neutral or ambivalent on the question of the inherent "orientedness" of the frame, which has (until now) not been an available option. Another reason it's appealing is that it's simply a 'different' format; we are so accustomed to 4:3, 16:9 and 5:4 screen ratios, that the square helps distinguish and defamiliarize the graphics. Finally there is a strong connection to historic abstraction and modernist image-making: think of the Malevich square, or this terrific article (brought to my attention by Zach Lieberman) about Eisenstein's thoughts on the "dynamic square" in cinema: https://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/cinema_journal/v051/51.2.wasson01.pdf
best
Golan Levin
flong.com

Zoë Salditch | Fri, Nov 21st, 2014 2:53 p.m.
Good Today post. Impressed with Scott's knowledge of panel manufacturing.

I'm biased towards the 9:16 ratio or "deep portrait" as Andrew Benson likes to call it. ( ^-^)