link spam arms race origins

Was complaining about the web-as-cesspool and comment-spamming a few posts back and should add that Google has much blame in this. The company that helped put obscure bloggers on the map in the early '00s then turned those highly-trafficked blogs into link farms later in the decade, not so much by design as through lack of ethics. In 2007, Anil Dash described how this happened:

Connecting PageRank to economic systems such as AdWords and AdSense corrupted the meaning and value of links by turning them into an economic exchange. Through the turn of the millennium, hyperlinking on the web was a social, aesthetic, and expressive editorial action. When Google introduced its advertising systems at the same time as it began to dominate the economy around search on the web, it transformed a basic form of online communication, without the permission of the web's users, and without explaining that choice or offering an option to those users.

Worse, the transformation was retroactive and the eventual mechanisms for opting out were incomplete in that the economic value could not be decoupled from the informational value. Inevitably, spammers arose to take advantage of the ability to create high-economic-value links at very low cost, causing vast damage to the ability to use links as a purely informational exchange. In addition, this forced Google to become more and more opaque about the refinements and adjustments it makes to its indexing algorithms, making a key part of their business less and less transparent over time. The eventual result has been the virtual decimation of communications systems like TrackBack, and absurdities like blogs linking to their own tag search results for key words in lieu of useful links, in an attempt to appease a search algorithm that they will never be allowed to fully understand.

An awareness of how a transformation in the fundamental value of links from informational to economic could have led Google to develop a system that separated editorial and aesthetic choices from economic ones, preventing the eventual link-spam arms race.

the big boys vs RSS

Good discussion at adactio about RSS and its enemies (hat tip naked capitalism).

It’s not like RSS is a great format—it isn’t. But it’s just good enough and just versatile enough to enable non-programmers to make something cool. In that respect, it’s kind of like HTML.

The official line from Twitter is that RSS is “infrequently used today.” That’s the same justification that Google has given for shutting down Google Reader. It reminds of the joke about the shopkeeper responding to a request for something with “Oh, we don’t stock that—there’s no call for it. It’s funny though, you’re the fifth person to ask today.”

And:

In a post called The True Web, Robin Sloan reiterates the strength of RSS: "It will dip and diminish, but will RSS ever go away? Nah. One of RSS’s weaknesses in its early days—its chaotic decentralized weirdness—has become, in its dotage, a surprising strength. RSS doesn’t route through a single leviathan’s servers. It lacks a kill switch." I can understand why that power could be seen as a threat if what you are trying to do is force your users to consume their own data only the way that you see fit (and all in the name of “user experience”, I’m sure).

A feed reader is still a good way to follow non-social-media sites that post infrequently (so you don't have to keep checking them); a collection of these "indies" is strong intellectual medicine in a web fast becoming homogenized and company-fied. In the next few days, ahead of the Google Reader shutdown, I'll post a handful of feed-reader alternatives.

Also of interest are Anil Dash's posts on The Web We Lost and rebuilding it.

.art URL words you can think about using

We are told that the introduction of industry-focused top level domains such as .car, .beef, and .skank are going to change the face of the internet as we know it today. The art world mailing list service-cum-publication e-Flux believes this strongly and has raised the $185,000 not to buy, but just to bid for the .art domain, assuring all artists that if e-Flux wins, the domain will only be used as a force for good.
So, if e-Flux wins, you need to start thinking of a cheeky URL a la del.icio.us or Art.sy so that you can be a player in the .art world. Ryz and I already have dibs on Golfc.art. Using an online Scrabble helper, andrej offers the list below of potential .art words. Start thinking about reserving yours now. Don't get left behind!

supersm.art
upperp.art
underp.art
redst.art
pushc.art
overt.art
outst.art
outsm.art
forep.art
brass.art
upst.art
unsm.art
trip.art
teac.art
subp.art
rest.art
rech.art
ramp.art
oxhe.art
misp.art
dogc.art
disp.art
comp.art
upd.art
thw.art
oxc.art
non.art
imp.art
dep.art
sw.art
st.art
sm.art
sc.art
qu.art
pe.art
ly.art
he.art
ch.art
bo.art
ap.art
w.art
t.art
p.art
m.art
k.art
h.art
f.art (Michael Manning floated this one in a Rhizome comment but I can think of websites that actually deserve it.)
d.art
c.art

"Kick Effects" (Music Video)

kickeffects_vimeo

Posted on Vimeo.
An embedded version is here.
"HD" or hi def should be on by default (see button on right side of controller).
If it isn't initially showing HD on your player, please shoot me an email.

The music is made with the Vermona kick drum synth, with 4/4 patterns treated with modular synth patches and a Reaktor plugin called Cyan (various permutations of these).